Saturday, 13 September 2014

Fire destroys dogs home

Yesterday morning I woke up to the news that a suspected arson attack had destroyed Manchester Dogs Home. One of the oldest and largest rescues in the country, it was founded in 1893 and takes in over 7000 dogs each year and the apparent deliberate destruction of this place of refuge and care hit me hard. When I thought about the dogs trapped in their kennels while fire destroyed all around them and then their lives - reports suggest 60 were killed and 150 injured - the terror and pain they must have experienced is too awful to contemplate. Many of them in the Centre find themselves there through abandonment and abuse, they had already experienced the dark side of human life and to perish that way makes my heart ache. And I mean ache, it's not a phrase for effect, I felt pained all day at the utter agony of this story.

But, amidst the horror of what transpired Thursday night, acts of individual, spontaneous courage by some were reported. Two local men, hearing the cries of the trapped dogs rushed to release those they could, leading them to safety and risking their own lives. This story shows the inherent decency of many people when they see animals suffering and it is easy to forget the majority of humans are kind to animals when we see cruelty, neglect and worse all around. On top of the individual acts of bravery, local people flocked during the night to the centre with donations, offers of help, items for the dogs, anything and everything they thought would be useful they took along. During yesterday, there were reports of people travelling from all over the country to offer help. This overwhelming, immediately positive response shows a depth of compassion for dogs, and those who care for them. I found this deeply moving yesterday, a feeling that was bolstered as a social media fuelled wave of generosity raised a phenomenal sum of money through the day. At the time of writing, the total money raised is over £1.2 million. A staggering sum to raise in a short period of time and great testament to how this story has touched people.

Yet, while this outpouring of help, generosity and practical support raised my spirits, today I can't shift the sadness that amongst all the amazing energy that will ensure the Centre will rise again so it can continue to do all the valuable work they have for well over a hundred years, the need for that work shows no signs of diminishing. Yesterday on social media I urged people to donate what they could but also to look at their local rescue centres and regularly help them in any way they can as every week they need help, not just in the aftermath of a devastating event. UK dogs and cats are in the middle of a terrible, ongoing tragedy: rescues around the country are full and overflowing because too many are being bred and bought on whims, casually discarded when those who buy them feel like it. Thousands of dogs are killed every year purely because there are not enough caring homes for them. There is a culture now that doesn't see dogs and cats as our lifelong companions and the rescues, like Manchester Dogs Home are the places that people dump them.

I want people to look beyond the immediate awful story and while they donate money, goods, skills and time, also do all they can to encourage others to not buy the puppy on a whim, not breed the dog for cash, or because it will be "nice for her to have a litter". Aside from the thought of the poor souls on Thursday night, these are the other reasons my heart aches when I think of the fire and what it's done.

This piece piece I came across yesterday afternoon expresses all I feel and more.

Donate here to the fund.

Tuesday, 9 September 2014

Pups and people, lots of people at Pup Aid

Primrose Hill, North-west London, Saturday 6 September was the perfect place for anyone to be who loves dogs, shopping for dogs, talking about dogs, admiring dogs, but most importantly caring, rescuing, protecting, adopting and loving dogs. It was Pup Aid Day and we were there, naturally.

Pup Aid is the brainchild of vet Marc Abraham, the UK's high profile dedicated campaigner against puppy farming and has been described as the "Live Aid" of animal welfare. It's an event that attracts celebrity supporters, lots of attention both locally in Primrose Hill and in the wider mainstream media. It's what the event is all about: awareness raising while having a great day out. I've no idea how many people and dogs attended throughout the day, but it seemed like thousands.

This year I persuaded Janet, the manager of the Diana Brimblecombe Animal Rescue Centre to come along and while I signed a few books, they raised funds by running a fun toy tombola which proved remarkably popular with the many children that were around.

 We had quite the dream team for the day: Bethany, committed, lively, teenage activist and DBARC volunteer who never seems to run out of energy kept the tombola turning and her mouth moving telling everyone about puppy farming, rescue and adoption....

 .....backed up by Donna and Zoe who pulled in the passersby, who were regaled with the reality of what puppy farming is by Kathleen, amazing non-stop spokesperson for her ex-breeders Darcie and Juno. Kathleen really found her vocation on Saturday and there cannot have been anyone who came past our little corner of Primrose Hill who didn't go away knowing a heck of a lot more about the misery and greed that puppy farming represents than when they got out of bed on Saturday.

 As is our way, it was all done with smiles and humour which were powered throughout the day by a steady supply of cakes and Michel's gourmet picnic. There was also the odd bit of shopping for essentials, like this little beauty.....

While Kathleen talked...and talked...Susie-Belle and I kept an eye on the stall, signed a few books and took part in the ex-breeders parade together with Twinkle.....

......this is a moving celebration of the lives of survivors of the puppy farming industry and reminds people what the day is really all about.

Marc kindly gave me the opportunity to talk a little more about Susie-Belle, something I'm always more than willing to do....
There were many great things about the day: I met several people that I've been in contact with on social media, all terrific supporters of the Pup Aid campaign and all doing what they can to end the suffering for the dogs.

It's great to be in the company of people who feel as strongly as I do that this has to end and together I am certain we will achieve it. I met others with dogs who have experienced and survived puppy farms: Angie & Tilly came down from Yorkshire and stopped by to say hello and buy a book, so nice to meet in person at last; Christina of Pet Adoption UK made time to meet us and kindly gave the dogs a little present each, so thoughtful. It was heartening talking to committed campaigners Beverley and Philippa, both dedicated to working with Pup Aid to get things changed and soon.

Saturday was a celebration of what is being achieved and a recognition that there is much still to do. But do it we will as we pull together, pool our efforts and show the world that the days of puppy farming and abusive breeding are numbered.

Friday, 5 September 2014

Parliamentary Debate

Yesterday was a big day in the UK for those campaigning to end puppy farming and the mass breeding and sale of puppies and kittens. In the House of Commons, MPs debated the following Backbench Motion, brought by MP Rob Flello.

 That this House has considered the e-petition relating to the sale of young puppies and kittens; notes that puppies produced at large-scale commercial breeding establishments, known as puppy farms, and irresponsibly-bred kittens are separated from their mothers too early and often transported long distances, and as a result often suffer serious life-threatening problems including impaired immune systems, poor socialisation, infectious diseases and shorter life spans; calls on the Government to review existing legislation to ensure that it is consistent with its own guidance that prospective owners should always see the puppy or kitten with its mother, and to ban the sale of puppies and kittens from retail centres such as pet shops, garden centres or puppy supermarkets; further notes the support of the Blue Cross, Dog Rescue Federation, Dogs Advisory Council, Dogs Trust, The Kennel Club, RSPCA and others for such a ban; and further calls on the Government and welfare organisations to work together to raise awareness among the public about choosing a dog responsibly from only ethical breeders or by adoption from legitimate rescue organisations, and to consider further steps to end the cruel practice of irresponsible and unethical breeding of puppies and kittens in the UK. (

Now when I say a big day, it's true that the day didn't bring a miraculous end to the ugly industry that trapped Susie-Belle for years, it didn't bring an end to pet shop sales, but what it did bring was a rising public awareness of the issues that must be tackled. It has, for the first time, got it into parliamentary business. There has been wide national media coverage on it. Social media for the past week has been buzzing with people tweeting, emailing and contacting their MPs to engage with this issue. The current level of engagement is unprecedented and needs building on.

But, amongst the coverage, there are the negatives, the ones who wonder why MPs are debating this when the world is in turmoil. Frustratingly, there are some choosing to focus on the low number of MPs who attended rather than the positive fact the debate occurred at all and what needs to be done to build on it. This frustrates me as someone who has been rallying everyone I can to lobby their own MPs, to publicise the debate, to get people to engage in the process and sat through most of the debate - I had to leave not having made provision for the dogs in my absence, assuming it wouldn't be a long debate where in fact it was three hours. I feel frustrated that it is not recognised by some moaning about attendance of MPs that the debate only came about through public pressure and a lot of hard work from campaigners: the e-petition that enabled yesterday to happen initiated by vet, Marc Abraham reached 111,000 signatures. This is backbench politics arising entirely from public pressure and should be applauded and built on, not trashed because the percentage of MPs there was low. This coverage from the Telegraph today says some of what I feel today:

"Likewise, ask any of the MPs talking about puppies today how many letters and emails they’ve had from voters about cute animals, and how many they’ve had about, say, Ukraine. Guess which issue does most to fill the postbag?
So before you lambast MPs for wasting their time talking about kittens, consider how often they get accused of ignoring public opinion and failing to listen to the people who pay their wages.
Face it: a lot of people care more about lovely puppies and adorable kittens than they do about war and death and economic and all the other important stuff they’ve supposed to be interested in. MPs wittering about animals while the world goes to hell in a handcart are just reflecting that fact".

Sitting through the debate, some of the MPs spoke well on the topic and clearly have a good grasp of the issues; others were less impressive, but overall the impression I took away was positive. On a personal note, listening to the better speakers I was forcibly struck by what this debate meant for dogs like Susie-Belle and Twinkle. While it didn't end the misery for the dogs still trapped in the industry, it gave voice to their suffering and is recorded now in a way never before seen in the UK. Their suffering was recognised in the place, among the minds of those who have the power to one day - soon I sincerely hope - to bring it to an end. The debate is moving on and from debate will come change. Too slowly of course, but it shifted on yesterday, whatever others try to say to knock the day into one of cliched complaining about MPs and what they're paid for, how useless they are and all the usual unhelpful and pointless ranting social media thrives on. As far as I'm concerned, yesterday changed things, we're no longer out in the wilderness of weird dog people who no-one listens to.

Read the full transcript of the debate here

Saturday, 30 August 2014

A few months back we were lucky to be visited by professional photographer Liz Benjamin
who is doing a brilliant photography project to raise awareness of puppy farming. We had fun posing on one of our local walks- well the dogs were posing - and today here is Susie-Belle's contribution to Liz's project. We love this picture of her, she's so special and this reflects that perfectly.

Saturday, 23 August 2014

3 years ago Susie-Belle's first big day out was Pup Aid - 2 weeks today we're returning

Soon after we brought Susie-Belle home to us 3 years ago, we took her out to a show that seemed made for her, the annual puppy farming awareness Fun Dog Show Pup Aid.

At that time it was held near Brighton, but since then it has been held in London, Primrose Hill and gone from strength to strength. This year's event has special significance as the parliamentary debate on puppy farming that Pup Aid's founder, Marc Abraham has spearheaded will be held a couple of days before. So, 6 September could see a day of celebrating enough MPs doing the decent thing and agreeing to ban third party sales of puppies in outlets such as pet shops and garden centres, or a day of mustering support and galvanising for a prolonged and difficult next stage of the campaign to end puppy farming.

However the debate goes, at Pup Aid, we intend celebrating the life of every puppy farm dog wherever they are, whether living in freedom like Susie-Belle and Twinkle, or still trapped by the inhumane humans who see them as breeding cash machines.  Every single dog deserves each ounce of love and recognition for being themselves, not a commodity, that the supporters of Pup Aid will show by being present on the day.

Here are extracts from Chapter 8 of our book which give a flavour of our first experience at Pup Aid, 3 years ago when Susie-Belle had been free of the puppy farm for 6 months and with us just a few weeks...

"Making our way down the hill from the car park amongst the building crowds involved a series of stops and starts as she paused to let people pass, only to take a few steps forwards, freeze and the same process take over again.When she stopped, I stopped and would kneel down next to her, giving her chin a reassuring tickle until she was happy to walk again"

"Once I'd wrestled with my own anxiety about Susie-Belle being amongst so many people and had taken a few deep breaths, I relaxed, looked around and realised what a fantastic event we were at. The atmosphere was lively but not frenetic and there were plenty of dogs of all shapes and sizes milling happily on stilts wandered around, amusing children and startling the adults". 

"Amongst the frivolity and fun, the purpose of the event was ever present with several stalls promoting awareness of puppy farming, small independent charities and organisations displaying pictures of breeding was sobering to see these images on a sunny day of joyful activity and remind ourselves why were there". 

"After lunch, we headed home but not before we had seen the emotionally moving parade of ex-breeding bitches, all rescued from terrible conditions in puppy farms and now living the kind of lives that all dogs should enjoy - free from pain, suffering and neglect, surrounded by an abundance of love and compassion.....seeing these damaged dogs was sad but powerfully reinforced the message of the day: buying puppies indiscriminately, ignorantly or just plain naively fuels the demand and continues the abuse of thousands of parent dogs. That night, I gave Susie-Belle an extra special supper and a gentle cuddle"

In the three years since that weekend, Susie-Belle has transformed herself. At this year's event, she will take part in the Parade, along with Twinkle. I couldn't have imagined that 3 years ago.

We will be there all day sharing our stall with the Diana Brimblecombe Animal Rescue Centre to help them to raise funds and enjoy the day with friends of DBARC. We'll be selling, signing and pawtographing copies of the book and donating all profits from sales made on the day to DBARC.

So, do come along, spread the word, get friends and family to come and be sure to pop over and say hello.

Sunday, 17 August 2014

Wednesday, 6 August 2014

When a home is not a home as I know it to be

Recently I've found myself getting involved in online discussions on people giving dogs up for rehoming and as expected, things get heated, points are made and misunderstood, opinions are aired and not appreciated, emotions run high. All par for the course when it comes to online discussions. But I really should know better than to jump into them. Only, if everyone shied away from trying to have honest discussions on tricky, important issues that affect thousands of dogs, nothing changes for the better. People never think about the flip side of what their instinctive, gut reactions tell them. The platitudes and  crocodile tears lie unchallenged. But, online it's always hard to get the balance right, to avoid alienating people, to stay respectful whilst adhering to what one's knowledge tells them and values underpin. I have a brilliant quote on my bag from RARE bags "When all think alike, no-one thinks very much" which is a pretty good guide to how I approach life. In fact all the quotes I chose for the bag sum up why I will always speak out if I think it might contribute to changing things for the better.

But, I know people don't like to be judged, or see someone judged who is giving up a dog because they can't give the life to the dog that it should have. I get that, but not every case of rehoming should go by, soaked in sympathy for the one giving up on the dog. The particular trigger for my recent online rough and tumble was someone who within a year was looking for a new home for the puppy they had bought, from a breeder who they wouldn't take it back to as they didn't trust the breeder to do the right thing for the puppy. Yet they'd bought the puppy in the first place, and were experienced with dogs. There are many things that are going to get my hackles up in this scenario. Put aside knowingly buying a puppy from a less than great breeder, an experienced owner to my mind, should know what is expected through the lifetime of a dog and plan ahead for most normal life changes, like having a baby, or moving house, or having to work longer hours. These events happen all the time, and people who really see the puppy they buy as their companion, their family, will make sure the life of the dog is included in these changes and make necessary adjustments and arrangements. Especially if that person has had a dog before. Otherwise, they should not bring a dog into their lives.

I do see it might be different for people never having had a dog before, the reality can be quite different to the idea of living with a dog and being entirely responsible for its happiness and welfare, for many years. But, an experienced owner, giving up on a dog within a year because life no longer includes that dog, is something that I will judge, some will say harshly. My sympathies are never going to spent on the person in this scenario. My compassion lies with the dog. Who, rightly so will be better off in a new home. But, the point that irks me, is that this should not be necessary. When, Battersea Cats and Dogs Home say that over half the dogs they take in are under 3 years old, this demonstrates a societal ease with giving up on dogs that I don't like. So, I will speak up and challenge those who feel the "heartbreak" that is being felt by the abandoner deserves sympathy. Well not mine.

Of course, I completely recognise there are going to be calamitous events in people's lives where a dog can no longer remain within the family, but in my view, these are rare, not common and of the order of bereavement or life-changing illness. Not, normal, life events like moving home, changing job or home, all the other common reasons frequently thrown out nowadays by people handing on their "loved, baby, furkid". Really?

There were people in the discussion that judged me harsh. I'm not harsh, or uncaring. Quite the opposite, but I do speak out when I see superficial words bandied around that masks the real issues which to me include a lack of responsibility towards what buying a dog in the first place really should involve. It goes to the heart of what is driving the puppy farming and hideous commercialism of dog breeding - people's casual wish to buy a puppy but not make a genuine life-long commitment to it. It should not be easy for people to buy a pet. There were those who wanted me to keep quiet and who take the view that dogs will make the transition between homes easily. Some will, some certainly won't. But, the point is, why should they have to? And then there was the comment, that a "forever" home is laudable but comes second to a "good home". A forever home should be a good home and a good home should be forever in my view. I make no apologies for wishing society aspired to feel the same. It used to. Dogs were not abandoned in the massive numbers they are these days. Other countries don't have this casual dumping of dogs going on. Sweden has very few rescue shelters, those they do have bring dogs in from other countries, because the Swedes see a puppy as a life-long commitment. So, when a forever home proves not to be within a year, because the experienced dog owner, who should have known what the dogs needs were, no longer offers their "loved" baby their home, I will speak up. Even if that isn't the popular thing to do. A few truths aired may make some think harder about bringing that puppy into their world and not committing to its lifetime, come what may.